Natural Resources Research Articles

Authors

Tim S. Doherty, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions
Mark G. Allen, Murdoch University
Karlene Bain, Python Ecological Services
Stephen Beatty, Murdoch University
Allan H. Burbidge, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions
Renee A. Catullo, University of Western Australia
Sarah Comer, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions
Ben Corey, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions
Saul J. Cowen, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions
Robert A. Davis, Edith Cowan University
Martin A. Dziminski, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions
J. Anthony Friend, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions
Bruce Greatwich, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions
Mark S. Harvey, University of Western Australia
Hannah Killian, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions
Michael E. Klunzinger, WA Museum
Damian C. Lettoof, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation
Nicola J. Mitchell, University of Western Australia
Melinda Moir, Department of Primary Industries and Regional Development, Western AustraliaFollow
Harry A. Moore, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions
David L. Morgan, Murdoch University
Ian J. Radford, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions
Michael J. Rix, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions
Tom Vigilante, Wunambal Gaambera Aboriginal Corporation
Adrian F. Wayne, University of Western Australia
Corey Whisson, WA Museum
Nicole Willers, University of Western Australia
Matthew R. Williams, Department of Biodiversity, Conservation and Attractions

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

1-8-2026

Journal Title

Pacific Conservation Biology

ISSN

ISSN 1038-2097, EISSN 2204-4604

Keywords

biodiversity conservation, fire ecology, fire management, habitat preferences, inappropriate fire regimes, range-restricted, threatened species, wildlife.

Disciplines

Biodiversity | Entomology | Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment | Natural Resources and Conservation

Abstract

Adverse fire regimes threaten biodiversity, potentially leading to population declines and increased extinction risk. Understanding how varying fire regimes affect threatened species is essential for effective ecosystem management, including in Western Australia where diverse ecosystems are exposed to wildfires, Indigenous burning, and prescribed fire. We compiled and synthesised data on the threat of adverse fire regimes to threatened animal taxa in Western Australia. Using a threat classification scheme, we ranked adverse fire regimes as having either no, low, medium, high, or unknown impact on each taxon. A total of 212 taxa were reviewed, 153 (72%) of which are considered fire-threatened: 29 high, 67 medium, 43 low, and 14 unknown impact. This includes 100% of threatened amphibians (3 taxa), 91% of threatened mammals (29), 71% of threatened invertebrates (85), 67% of threatened fish (6), 63% of threatened reptiles (10) and 61% of threatened birds (20). Only some bird (6), mammal (5), and invertebrate (18) taxa received a ranking of ‘high’. Across all fire-threatened taxa, we synthesised 330 fire response cases from 169 studies. Most taxa (75%) are considered fire-threatened due to small ranges and limited dispersal (primarily invertebrates and island taxa), with much smaller numbers reliant on long-unburnt vegetation ( > 10–40 years; 7%) or habitat features that take decades to form (e.g. tree hollows; 7%). Many taxa should be considered putatively fire-threatened until further information on their fire responses and the nature of fire regimes within their ranges is collected. We identify key research priorities to inform fire management and threatened species conservation.

This file is 4.1 MB. Files over 3MB may be slow to open. For best results, right-click and select "save as..."

Share

COinS
 

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.1071/PC25051