Efficient economic and environmental management of pastoral systems: Theory and application

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

11-15-2014

Journal Title

Agricultural Systems

ISSN

ISSN 0308-521X eISSN 1873-2267

Keywords

Efficiency, Trade-off curves, Livestock, Supplement

Disciplines

Agribusiness | Agricultural and Resource Economics | Agricultural Economics | Agricultural Science | Beef Science | Climate | Dairy Science | Environmental Indicators and Impact Assessment | Environmental Monitoring | Hydrology | Meat Science | Natural Resource Economics | Natural Resources and Conservation | Natural Resources Management and Policy | Operations and Supply Chain Management | Plant Biology | Soil Science | Sustainability | Water Resource Management

Abstract

A framework for interpreting profit–environmental trade-offs in pastoral agriculture is introduced, drawing on the concepts of economic and environmental efficiency. The approach provides insights into appropriate policy mechanisms to address the environmental footprint of agricultural production. The framework is applied in the context of nitrogen leaching from pasture-based New Zealand dairy farms. This application identifies that the economic and environmental efficiency of these farms is mainly driven by imported supplement use. Grass-only farming is environmentally-efficient, with greater supplementation generating higher nutrient outflows to waterways. However, profits increase with higher supplementation within a critical range of intensification. Economic efficiency requires low use of supplement to promote herbage utilisation and reduce pasture senescence at low stocking rates, combined with high use of supplement to fill critical feed deficits at high stocking rates. Model output suggests that there exists scope for win/win solutions for private/public agents through improving the conversion of supplement to milk on New Zealand dairy farms. However, the scope to achieve such gains may be restricted in reality, given incentives for intensification, the potential cost of intensive farm planning, and personal barriers to behaviour change.

Share

COinS
 

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2014.10.011