Biosecurity Research Articles

Document Type

Article

Publication Date

6-2025

Journal Title

Animal Production Science

ISSN

ISSN: 1836-0939, eISSN: 1836-5787

Keywords

control tool, farm, livestock, pastoralism, predator, South Africa, stocking rate, Western Australia

Disciplines

Biosecurity | Other Animal Sciences

Abstract

Context

Predation impacts livestock farming enterprises worldwide. In South Africa and Western Australia, native and non-native predators negatively impact sheep and cattle farming enterprises. Aims

We hoped to compare the perspectives on predator impacts of livestock producers in relation to livestock predation in South Africa and Western Australia. Methods

Online and in-person surveys consisting of 26 questions were posed to farmers and pastoralists in both countries. The questions related to land ownership, property size, livestock management, predation impact (financial and livestock losses), control of predators, and other impacts on productivity. Key results

Livestock production properties are of a similar size and stocking rate in both countries, but Western Australia has some very large stations. Predation impacts on livestock production are felt in both countries, with South Africa having a larger array of predators, resulting in higher financial impacts. Despite control tools being similar in both countries, deployment of the tools differed. Conclusions

Losses to predators are higher in South Africa as their predator management is localised and reactive to predation, whereas Western Australia has a proactive landscape-scale approach to predator control through Recognised Biosecurity Groups. Implications

Predators impact farming enterprises in both countries, but the number of predators and the use of available control methods influence the level of impact the predators have on the productivity of farms in both Western Australia and South Africa.

Share

COinS
 

Digital Object Identifier (DOI)

https://doi.org/10.1071/AN25046